0 0
Re: CIETAC South China Sub-Commission
CIETAC South China Sub-Commission [Article]
This is a comment to the article. Please click the link to view the original article.
Post 1 of 5
Quoting from [Admin]:

 


To contact CIETAC South China directly, please email to info@sccietac.org.

        Thia ia need to put in  Forum .. Safe Trade
SIGNATURE:
About Our Company

JAVATICA
Teak Furniture-Maker from Java-Indonesia, full wood furniture of: reproduction antique, ethnics, colonial, art deco, modern simple, garden & beach, pool side, patio set, Using Teak, Mahogany, other tropical wood,... More

CIETAC South China Sub-Commission [Article]
This is a comment to the article. Please click the link to view the original article.
21 Jul 2008 10:01
Post 2 of 5



Your fees is too high, and in most cases the either of party will have to move to court since you have no authority to actually execute the decision that you may reach.

 

 

12 Oct 2008 12:26
Post 3 of 5
melody618qw
offline
No Company Website yet
Overall Ranking MVP:66 Rank:69,067

Comment from an expert correcting Mr. Tarun's misunderstanding:


 According to the New York Convention with 143 member countries, an arbitral award is enforcible and only subject to very limited judicial review (only when corruption or undue process occurs, which is highly  rare).


That is, member countries  recognize and enforce  arbitral  award  between each  other, so the arbitral award is as good as, and even better than a court decision, since a national court decision can't be enforced out side of  its  home  country because there is no such international convention on court decision.






Quoting from [Tarun]:




Your fees is too high, and in most cases the either of party will have to move to court since you have no authority to actually execute the decision that you may reach.


20 Oct 2008 18:46
Post 4 of 5
melody618qw
offline
No Company Website yet
Overall Ranking MVP:66 Rank:69,067

Comment from an expert correcting Mr. Tarun's misunderstanding:


 According to the New York Convention with 143 member countries, an arbitral award is enforcible and only subject to very limited judicial review (only when corruption or undue process occurs, which is highly  rare).


That is, member countries  recognize and enforce  arbitral  award  between each  other, so the arbitral award is as good as, and even better than a court decision, since a national court decision can't be enforced out side of  its  home  country because there is no such international convention on court decision.

Comment from an expert correcting Mr. Tarun's misunderstanding:


 According to the New York Convention with 143 member countries, an arbitral award is enforcible and only subject to very limited judicial review (only when corruption or undue process occurs, which is highly  rare).


That is, member countries  recognize and enforce  arbitral  award  between each  other, so the arbitral award is as good as, and even better than a court decision, since a national court decision can't be enforced out side of  its  home  country because there is no such international convention on court decision.

20 Oct 2008 18:49
Post 5 of 5
melody618qw
offline
No Company Website yet
Overall Ranking MVP:66 Rank:69,067

Enforciblity of an Arbitral Award:



 According to the New York Convention with 143 member countries, an arbitral award is enforcible and only subject to very limited judicial review (only when corruption or undue process occurs, which is highly  rare).


That is, member countries  recognize and enforce  arbitral  award  between each  other, so the arbitral award is as good as, and even better than a court decision, since a national court decision can't be enforced out side of  its  home  country because there is no such international convention on court decision.

 

 

20 Oct 2008 20:13
Email this page Bookmark this page