1 2
America _IS_ oil-rich and oil-independent!
Post 1 of 12

Just saw an interesting video about a secret, classified oil find in Purdue Bay, Alaska.It clearly shows that America has more than enough oil for itself, but to be able to drive prices up and make people dependent, this find has been classified. See for yourself:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147&hl=en

07 Jun 2008 08:50
Post 2 of 12
Quoting from [germex]:

Just saw an interesting video about a secret, classified oil find in Purdue Bay, Alaska.It clearly shows that America has more than enough oil for itself, but to be able to drive prices up and make people dependent, this find has been classified. See for yourself:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147&hl=en


The only Idea I think we have many in Europe is America try to control the production of the oil to any cost.


Britain and America have always insisted the war in Iraq had nothing to do with oil. Bush said the aim was to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction and end Saddam’s support for terrorism.



but in end time the true is :


AMERICA’s elder statesman of finance, Alan Greenspan, has shaken the White House by declaring that the prime motive for the war in Iraq was oil.


After end the second war . We think all the european the violation of **** torture and genocidie is stop forever


We need to think about all this



07 Jun 2008 16:47
Post 3 of 12
Quoting from [saraenterprise]:


We need to think about all this

That's exactly the point! It's good to remember the political background for a while, to better understand, but in the end we'll have to admit that we can't change it. So we do have to think, but about how to cope with the facts.

For example, this oil find tells me that for quite some time the oil companies will want to slave me, so it makes sense to look for solutions. If it were just a temporary problem or shortage, I wouldn't react very much.

07 Jun 2008 17:19
Post 4 of 12
Quoting from [germex]:

Quoting from [saraenterprise]:



We need to think about all this

That's exactly the point! It's good to remember the political background for a while, to better understand, but in the end we'll have to admit that we can't change it. So we do have to think, but about how to cope with the facts.

For example, this oil find tells me that for quite some time the oil companies will want to slave me, so it makes sense to look for solutions. If it were just a temporary problem or shortage, I wouldn't react very much.



You know what they say, modern technology is far ahead of what we are enjoying now. Computer, mobile phone and all other digital technology is in a advance stage and wwe are only playing at the infant stage. You know why?

The reason is so that all those technocrats can produce gadget that go by generation to generation. That is business. If you were to push the most advance out immediately, how are you going to make money for the intermediate stage. So instead of Version latest, they give you version 1, 3 months later, version 2 etc....

Computer will go from Pentium 1 to 2 to 3 and so on.

People will have to change their Mobile, Computer, PDA and so forth every few months. THis is how those businessmen make their dole.

So have you got the picture. Supply goes with Demand. Too much supply, down goes the price. Too much Demand, happily to the bank, the supplier.

Talk about conspiracies theories or say that this is a vicious circle that is control by upper hand will get us nowhere. Is it a gross injustice, you bet.

Anyway, (sigh), I think we are going to get the chop again grandpa. 

 

10 Jun 2008 02:38
Post 5 of 12

Nah, I don't think they will chop our heads off this time! And if they do, I have many other heads to use! [em2]

 

Anyway, you are right regarding holding back the ultimate to first sell the intermediate. And making people believe we have an oil crisis is also a good way to drive up prices and earnings. Wonderful!

 

By the way, the deep drilling technology developed by the Russians has not only proven that oil is not the product of decay of organic matter, but that it is continuously synthesized from hydrogen, oxygen and carbon in the Earth’s crust. That’s why many oil fields are replenishing. The other thing it has proven is that therefore there is no “peak oil”. It’s all a misleading scam to pull money out of our pockets!

 

For example, Vietnam is supposed not to have oil fields. So the oil companies made them a “good” offer (only good for the oil companies) to supply them with oil. As Vietnam wasn’t reasonably able to pay such high prices, Russia helped them out and drilled just one deep well. That was enough to supply Vietnam with almost all the oil they need. - Shouldn't there also be a lot of oil deep under the vast extension of the US territory?

Now tell me why we don’t find that kind of info in the Western media! [em5]

10 Jun 2008 09:19
Post 6 of 12
Quoting from [germex]:

 



Tomorrow I am going to start digging my back yard. Maybe if I dug deep enough, I'll strike oil and I don't have to be so negative in this forum anymore.[em2][em2]

But seriously, I have heard about the theory you wrote about (it was questioned by certain Mod) in another articles. Will have to check on this, it sound interesting.

Root of all evils is money, oil=money, so I supposed oil is the root of all evils. [em3]

10 Jun 2008 23:27
Post 7 of 12
Quoting from [rgs_frankyeo]:

Quoting from [germex]:

 




Tomorrow I am going to start digging my back yard. Maybe if I dug deep enough, I'll strike oil and I don't have to be so negative in this forum anymore.[em2][em2]

But seriously, I have heard about the theory you wrote about (it was questioned by certain Mod) in another articles. Will have to check on this, it sound interesting.

Root of all evils is money, oil=money, so I supposed oil is the root of all evils. [em3]



Abiotic oil or peak oil, inorganic oil or organic oil, lots of theories and lots of proponents and opponents for either theories.

If you are sencitive enough, you can feel the bias in all the debate.

Include a site where you might received a few insight into this debate and some very useful information.

http://www.questionsquestions.net/docs04/peakoil1.html

Either theories is fine with me, I am a proponent of "Alternative fuel" for the world well-being.

Enjoy the reading.

11 Jun 2008 01:58
Post 8 of 12
Quoting from [rgs_frankyeo]:

Either theories is fine with me, I am a proponent of "Alternative fuel" for the world well-being.

Well, there is indeed a lot of bias, and part of it is the desire to keep us looking at the debate, but not at the options, like the "alternative fuel" you mention. Or what do you think why oil companies now advocate biofuels, given that it will never be able to substitute oil entirely? It's part of the scam that wants to make people believe "there is no other choice", "we are helpless". Yeah, right! [em5]

Furthermore, the question really is, "do we need fuels?" There are (still primitive) inventions of motors that rely on attracting or repelling magnetic fields and other potential sources of continuous power. But guess what the patent office does if you try to patent that? They refuse it! By law they have no right to do that. They only have the right to patent something that according to their archives doesn't exist yet, and in that case they even have the obligation to do so. So why do they refuse the patent? You know the answer!

Regarding that mod, he likes to question, refute, attack, delete, etc., so trying to explain something to him doesn't make sense. Just forget him!

But please don't start digging in your backyard! What if you really strike oil? You'll contaminate the whole neighborhood! [em2]

11 Jun 2008 09:19
Post 9 of 12
Quoting from [germex]:

Quoting from [rgs_frankyeo]:

 

 




Have I told you, I am also a believer (maybe a lone) in negative energy.

Energy in any formed not fully utlised, turned into negative energy. Continuous source of energy is almost impossible because some energy will be lost and translate into another form of energy. For example, when electrical current runs through a circuit, there is energy lost because the wire use havesome resistance in themselves. This energy is converted into heat energy and dissipated, this is the lost energy and it is a negative energy.

The greenhouse effect, why, because of the present ecological situation. Trees are getting less because of indiscriminating cutting and burning. The sun who has been contributing it energy was not fully utilised, so lots of it energy became a negative energy.

A car will generate negative energy, our lighting system, air-conditioning system will all produce negative energy. This waste energies tax on what mother nature can replenished fast enough.

Worse still, this energies has turned against those that produce them, hence the term "negative energies". The global warming, pollution, climate changes and for all you know the earthquake (don't kill me for the last suggestion) could be all caused by negative energies.

Even for a human being, if we don't channel our energies into something constructive, we will be creating havoc with our negative, just like the recent killing in Japan. And it will be equally bad if we will just keep this energy within ourselves, someday it will explode or once you can contain it, it will be release, either as possitive or negative energies. So it is always be advisable to speak up, release your pent-up emotion, it may be a good way to release the energy in you.

P. S. When I dug oil in my back yard, my whole neighbourhood is going to celebrate by having the biggest backyard BBQ in history. You will be invited, of course.[em2]

11 Jun 2008 22:24
Post 10 of 12
Quoting from [rgs_frankyeo]:

P. S. When I dug oil in my back yard, my whole neighbourhood is going to celebrate by having the biggest backyard BBQ in history. You will be invited, of course.[em2]

Will you fuel my plane to China with your oil? [em3]

Anyway, I've never before heard the use of the words "negative energy" the way you do, but after the explanation you offer, I agree. There is no 100% effective conversion, so we'll always have a "loss" in practical terms (sometimes with quite negative side effects), though the total sum of energy remains the same.

The trick is of course using this fact to your advantage. Have you ever seen those refrigerators that have a little gas flame that starts the cooling process? As this flame is (intentionally) too small, the process has to "borrow" energy from somewhere else. It gets it from the interior of the refrigerator, and this way it cools down. Eventually the heat will go back into the refrigerator (that's why I say it's "borrowed"), but who cares, as you continue cooling it.

Regarding the earthquake, have a look at the pictures taken a few seconds before it happened (the strange lights you can see in the sky), and then do a search for "HAARP". That stands for "High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program". You'll be amazed... and then very angry!

Regarding the "Jatropha" subject, could we continue discussing that in the "Other Industries" forum? After all, it's more than just about cultivating the plant, but also about the industrial processes to extract and convert the oil, what to do with the leftover "cake", etc. And in in this forum we won't have to fight for our "survival"...

12 Jun 2008 09:28
Post 11 of 12
Quoting from [germex]:

 

Regarding the "Jatropha" subject, could we continue discussing that in the "Other Industries" forum? After all, it's more than just about cultivating the plant, but also about the industrial processes to extract and convert the oil, what to do with the leftover "cake", etc. And in in this forum we won't have to fight for our "survival"...



Always like to create some weird idea to stimulate my mind and that of others. For all you know, some good might come out of it.

With regard to your suggestion, could you be kind enough to show me where and how I could best follwo-up this subject.

Thank you in anticipation.

12 Jun 2008 18:35
Email this page Bookmark this page