Posted on Jan 25, 2008 at 18:38
Moderators for 6-mth Trust Pass Selection
This is our suggestion, the criteria to select the 5 moderators for the 6 month Trust Pass Gifts from Alibaba as token of appreciation for their hard work not popularity, or MVPs.
Use this fair way to choose by the Number of Postings, No. of Replies, No. of Questions, No. of Answers and No. of Best Answers. Of course, the older moderators, i.e. moderators who have been on board for longer period of time, have the advantage.
From the 8 candidates, the findings are as below:
,
Rankings of
No. of Postings: No.1 Int 786 with 309; No. 2 Macs 177; and No.3 Usama 146.
No. of Replies: No.1 Ranger 2523; No. 2 Foow 1565; and No. 3 Macs 1083.
No. of Questions: No.1 Int786 77; 2. Macs 52; 3. Foow 37.
No. of Answers: No. 1 Macs 1666; 2. Foow 1382 and 3. Ranger 1235.
No. of Best Ans.: No. 1 Grigo 318; 2. Aussie 314; and 3. Foow 309.
If you were to take the average of the rankings, the results will be very much different from the MVPs total they have.
iAlternatively, you can give 100 points to first. 50 points to second and 30 points to third position in the rankings. Add up their points, total tally and select the first 3 most active moderators. Give more weights to this selection than the votes, because it is only based on popularity and politics. Give 60% weights for the activity counts and 40% for the polls.
This is just my suggestion, of course, we cannot question the giver of the Gifts, or look at a gift horse in the mouth, but just to be logical and on the side of fairness in the evaluation, this is done by other forum boards and it works well and is answerable to queries over abuse and malpractices.
Street Smart
Use this fair way to choose by the Number of Postings, No. of Replies, No. of Questions, No. of Answers and No. of Best Answers. Of course, the older moderators, i.e. moderators who have been on board for longer period of time, have the advantage.
From the 8 candidates, the findings are as below:
,
| Foow | Grigo | Braham | Int786 | Aussie | Ranger | Usama | Macs | |
| Postings | 43 | 110 | 100 | 309 | 72 | 133 | 146 | 177 |
| Replies | 1565 | 1714 | 844 | 405 | 958 | 2523 | 474 | 1083 |
| Questions | 37 | 21 | 24 | 77 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 52 |
| Answers | 1382 | 1131 | 873 | 122 | 371 | 1235 | 465 | 1666 |
| Best Ans. | 309 | 318 | 227 | 8 | 60 | 314 | 83 | 140 |
Rankings of
No. of Postings: No.1 Int 786 with 309; No. 2 Macs 177; and No.3 Usama 146.
No. of Replies: No.1 Ranger 2523; No. 2 Foow 1565; and No. 3 Macs 1083.
No. of Questions: No.1 Int786 77; 2. Macs 52; 3. Foow 37.
No. of Answers: No. 1 Macs 1666; 2. Foow 1382 and 3. Ranger 1235.
No. of Best Ans.: No. 1 Grigo 318; 2. Aussie 314; and 3. Foow 309.
If you were to take the average of the rankings, the results will be very much different from the MVPs total they have.
iAlternatively, you can give 100 points to first. 50 points to second and 30 points to third position in the rankings. Add up their points, total tally and select the first 3 most active moderators. Give more weights to this selection than the votes, because it is only based on popularity and politics. Give 60% weights for the activity counts and 40% for the polls.
This is just my suggestion, of course, we cannot question the giver of the Gifts, or look at a gift horse in the mouth, but just to be logical and on the side of fairness in the evaluation, this is done by other forum boards and it works well and is answerable to queries over abuse and malpractices.
Street Smart


