0 0
Does bank prefer document collection than LC? and format of documents
Post 1 of 3
iammm1
offline
No Company Website yet
Overall Ranking MVP:141 Rank:2,694
Shipment was done yesterday and I sent DESPATCH DETAIL by fax to the applicant.
Q1) since this is an Air shipment, LC term is from Toronto airport to Mumbai airport. But flight is not direct so there are two light numbers. EG) #123, from toronto to A and #124 vancouver to Mumbai airport. LC states as “flight number" then how can I describe?

Q2) As I understand, as long as address and name of the applicant is recognizable and consistent LC bear the typo.. (Something like this) but does missing comma can create discrepancy? like 122 aaa st, Toronto. and document is created as 122 aaa st Toronto ( no comma).

Q3) Is there a rule to follow to create document what LC required? Such as Despatch details. When LC states to send fax of despatch details including Name of vessel, Quantity shipped and ETD and ETA ect. We shipped 2 each of 3 different products. Then should I state as Total Quantity shipped: 6? or describe what we shipped with quantity shipped? (I created as Qty2 and description of goods, and listed other goods). Also should we include time of arrival? And is document TITLE have to be DESPATCH DETAILS? How about FAX DESPATCH/ SHIPPING DETAILS?

Q4) Why bank prefer document collection than pay under LC?
When bank informed to correct document for other shipment, they said bank try to make hard for beneficiary, so they can ask for collection. I want to know why and if it is true.

I am sorry to ask so many, and basic questions. I really appreciate your reply. These are too simple, so it was hard to find a straight answer..
Thank you in advance.
Award 50 MVPs ( What's this? )for the best answer.
20 Jan 2008 00:21
Post 2 of 3
Quoting from [iammm1]:


Shipment was done yesterday and I sent DESPATCH DETAIL by fax to the applicant.

Q1) since this is an Air shipment, LC term is from Toronto airport to Mumbai airport. But flight is not direct so there are two light numbers. EG) #123, from toronto to A and #124 vancouver to Mumbai airport. LC states as “flight number" then how can I describe?


Q2) As I understand, as long as address and name of the applicant is recognizable and consistent LC bear the typo.. (Something like this) but does missing comma can create discrepancy? like 122 aaa st, Toronto. and document is created as 122 aaa st Toronto ( no comma).


Q3) Is there a rule to follow to create document what LC required? Such as Despatch details. When LC states to send fax of despatch details including Name of vessel, Quantity shipped and ETD and ETA ect. We shipped 2 each of 3 different products. Then should I state as Total Quantity shipped: 6? or describe what we shipped with quantity shipped? (I created as Qty2 and description of goods, and listed other goods). Also should we include time of arrival? And is document TITLE have to be DESPATCH DETAILS? How about FAX DESPATCH/ SHIPPING DETAILS?


Q4) Why bank prefer document collection than pay under LC?

When bank informed to correct document for other shipment, they said bank try to make hard for beneficiary, so they can ask for collection. I want to know why and if it is true.


I am sorry to ask so many, and basic questions. I really appreciate your reply. These are too simple, so it was hard to find a straight answer..

Thank you in advance.



I guess Im confused here maybe but is this deal pertaining to a Documentary Letter of Credit or simply Documents against acceptance?  Question 1 you mention an L/C and question 4 you ask why payment is by document acceptance instead of by negotiation of documents under an L/C.  If this was an L/C it should have stated the documents needed.

Q1 Does the the L/C state transhipment prohibited?  If not then it is allowed.  You can describe simply as named carrier flight# depart TOR/named carrier flight # arrive Mumbai. 

Q2 Make sure the paperwork matches that of the letter of credit.  If it was issued without the (,) then leave it out.  Typos on addresses are not really relavent, but good practice is to supply documents in the way the information is given on the L/C

Q3  Really if you had questions about what was required you should have contacted the buyer to spell out exactly what they required.  Also if this is shipment via Air there is no way to name a vessel.  Also correctly would have been to identify all 3 products at a quanity of 2 and a total quanity of 6.  Without knowing specifically what documents were required by the buyer it would be hard to finish this answer. 

Q4  Im not understanding what your asking?   What was ammended?  If this L/C was ammended it would have to of been ratified by you as well if it wass issued as irrevocable.

Ranger

SIGNATURE:
About Our Company

Me Tech Supply
ME Tech Supply a D. B. A provides sourcing solutions for both small and medium sized businesses. We are members of the GSAA whose Agents have verified more than 2. 5 million companies World WideWe offer low cos... More

20 Jan 2008 08:39
Post 3 of 3
iammm1
offline
No Company Website yet
Overall Ranking MVP:141 Rank:2,694
Replying to [Ranger]: Thank you for answering questions. Since this is the first LC ( and worked for 3month in traffic) , I wasn't sure what I need to ask.[em9]
For Q3) Next time I will ask if they want to know , just quanity ( such as how many ) or description with quantity.

For Qeustion 4 is not about my shipment, bank called for correcting LC which is done by my college. And she mentioned that to me, bank will find many things to make us hard to get paid under LC. And she mentioned that bank likes to lead beneficiary ( us) for a collection. So I am not sure why bank would do that.
That was my question.

Today I sent a non negotiable documents to applicant and will present documents within 2days. So I have enough time to correct, if they ask me to. I don't think I have too many problems other than stating date of issue which wasn't required. LC stated " all documents much state Documentary letter of credit no. " but my co worker advise me that I should state date of issue too. I hope that doesn't create any problems. If it is , then I will change.

If bank requires to present without date of issue, then I can create new one withone date of issue. However, is it ok to present different from what I sent to the applicant ( shipping dox by courier within 3 working days -before presentation )?
Is issuing bank compare shipping dox from what I sent with shipment to documents that I sent for presentation?

Thank you very much.

21 Jan 2008 18:03
Email this page Bookmark this page