Replying to [New trader]:
Hello there,
Here is the whole deal about middle mans.
- If you have been hired by the buyer to get the goods, and are being
used as a security point to control the payment and the goods,
then you are liable for all losses, mistakes and etc. incured since
that would be your function not to let that happen.
- If you are on the seller side, then you are in charge of receiving
the payment from the buyer, in case the payment doesn´t come
on time, you are liable for losses incured. And also become liable
on the buyer complain about anything, but not financially. This type
is suggested the most, since its more or less on mutual
understanding, and only have small limitations. And the only thing
which is suggested in this case is to have a contract with the seller
not to override you, and buyer protection whom ever you bring to
him.
- The best possible thing that can be is that you connect buyer
and seller, bound by contract which cannot do a business without
your consent, should they have done so, then they are liable for it.
In addition to that for any deals incurred you will get commission.
- Contract based Middleman, which basically means you have been
hired by either side to complete the deal, this is quiet difficult
since due to even smallest delays, and payment issues, you
become liable on both sides, so watch out for the types of contract.
- The major problem though you will be facing is if you bring to parties
together, mostlikely the buyers will always try to override. So like I
already pointed out, the second suggestion is the best way to go.
Good Luck.