0 1
Re: TT (Telegraphic Transfer), * bill etc. vs. LC (Letter of Credit)
TT (Telegraphic Transfer), * bill etc. vs. LC (Letter of Credit) [Article]
This is a comment to the article. Please click the link to view the original article.
Post 1 of 14
honeymoon
offline
No Company Website yet
Overall Ranking MVP:29 Rank:1,814,679
Replying to [Catalyst]: Good information.[em19]
TT (Telegraphic Transfer), * bill etc. vs. LC (Letter of Credit) [Article]
This is a comment to the article. Please click the link to view the original article.
10 Sep 2007 22:41
Post 2 of 14
Replying to [honeymoon]:

Thanks. Glad you appreciate.[em1]
11 Sep 2007 08:31
Post 3 of 14
mallmallma
offline
No Company Website yet
Overall Ranking MVP:-70 Rank:1,970,686
Dear friend:
welcome to visit our website!You can never find such a low price in other place...
(we are one of china's biggest wholesaler of electrical product such as:digital cameras, mobile, LCD TV, Laptops Notebooks, Digital Video, GPS,Mp4, ... and so on.)
If you make a big of order from our website,we will give you more of special discount,thank you very much
WEB : www.mall-ebay.com
MSN : malleeby@hotmail.com
E-mail : malleeby@gmail.com
25 Sep 2007 06:49
Post 4 of 14
Replying to [mallmallma]:

If I am not mistaken, your "reply" and posting had no relevance to the issue or the topic under discussion!!
26 Sep 2007 03:31
Post 5 of 14
ChuanBen
offline
No Company Website yet
Overall Ranking MVP:50 Rank:630,303
Replying to [Catalyst]:We offen use TT,because we think it's more straightforward.
19 Dec 2007 22:52
Post 6 of 14
Replying to [ChuanBen]:

Sure, why not? But do consider the associated risks. My point, incidentally, was that comparing TTs with LCs was like comparing apples with oranges. It looks like, in spite of my long article, I have failed to bring out that difference, or in making that point clear.
22 Dec 2007 19:34
Post 7 of 14
bitstomper
offline
No Company Website yet
Overall Ranking MVP:52 Rank:127,113
Replying to [Catalyst]:That is because you only explain the process of distinguishing the differences between the two or which one to chose. You actually do not explain the pro's and cons of using either method, nor do you explain the methods.
20 Feb 2008 06:55
Post 8 of 14
Replying to [bitstomper]:

I stand corrected. Thank you kindly, sir![em19]

But, I do recall that I did, or at least tried to...!
21 Feb 2008 20:30
Post 9 of 14
Replying to [Catalyst]: sir, Can I accept T/T for the smaller amount like less than 500 usd , and how is the commision charged by the bank on lower amount , Or else what is the best option.?
22 Feb 2008 08:34
Post 10 of 14
Replying to [rajaram]:


The rates vary from bank to bank. For smaller amounts, the percentage becomes too large.

In all remittances, at least TWO banks are involved. One is the remitter's bank. The other is yours. Even if you so arrange that the remitter will pay for his bank's charges, you can hardly ask him to pay YOUR bank's charges. It would be very kind indeed for the remitter to agree to pay the bank charges for BOTH the banks. Would he?
25 Feb 2008 06:29
Post 11 of 14
Replying to [Catalyst]: Thank you for your very good advise and sharing knowlege , If bank charges to me then of course I will pay the charges , I think it will not much , for 1000 usd bank charges must be less than 50 usd , less than 5% more or less it should be like this?

04 Mar 2008 06:43
Email this page Bookmark this page